The Big BadPsychics List

This list is a constant evolving work in progress, new Psychics will be added to it as we expose them. The list below is by no means a comprehensive list of all the psychics we have exposed. So please do explore the site and forum and I am sure you will find what you are looking for, and if not post a request on the forum and we will see what we can do.

Please note that the original BadPsychics List from the old site is still available along with all articles on the forum.

So please check out the forum.


BadPsychics


Colin Fry
Charlie Kelly
Deborah Jane Higgins (McDonald/Davies)
Derek Acorah
Emma Kinsey
Gail Cuffe aka Psychic123UKreadings
Janette Abbott
Lorraine Ash
Lisa Williams
Marcus Day
Matthew James
Sally Morgan
Theresa Caputo
Psychic Twins (Terry Jamison and Linda Jamison)
Timothy Abbott
Tony Stockwell
Tyler Henry
William Constantine

30 comments:

  1. IT would break my heart to see my name here!
    I have been a working medium for over 35fff years. I run Aura Connections with my friend Kate and twice been asked to do TV.
    There is the issue! TV ...
    We once did a paranormal investigation ( with a stoke group) they said after meeting Kate and myself "we want it hard core"!! ... Really???
    You will get what spirit give no more!!! And if you want us to play and act up! No chance!!
    Please no we are not all like this??
    But there is pressure to deliver a "show"!! Be the stronger and say NO!
    I'm proud of who I am, I'm proud of where I come from. My Grandmother was the late Dora Allen she often worked with Doris Stokes.. She had a wonderful reputation in the East Midlands and I'm proud we too are going that way...
    I understand why you expose these people.. But please remember a lot of us are genuine with good hearts
    L&L
    Donna Lesley ( psychic medium )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dorris Stokes was a fraud too, she was exposed in the Daily Mail if memory recalls.
      She was using plants in the audience, giving readings to people she had read for before but pretending it was the first time.

      And I doubt you will get your name on here, as you are small time, and I try to keep this list for big name frauds.

      But I will say this, if you are genuine, I would invite you to prove yourself to me, for if you can convince me you are legit, then you can convince anyone.

      Of course I already know the answer, "why should I prove myself to you" blah blah blah.

      Anyway my email is on the site. find it, email me, and lets try and prove your claims as real, if not, then clearly you are a fraud as well.

      Delete
    2. Also as clearly stated on your site
      "Aura Connections would like to state readings are for entertainment purposes."

      You just admitted your readings are not real right there!

      Delete
  2. By law all practicing mediums have to clearly state (that what they do is for entertainment purposes) otherwise they are open to being sued.
    So Jon Donnis I actually, don't think you are quite the expert of exposing fake mediums as much as you clearly delusional think you are
    Many thanks for exposing yourself as not knowing even the basics for what you think you can do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok, show me which law states that?

      Any psychic or medium can clearly state they are 100% genuine.
      ONLY a fake one would be open to be sued, it all comes under the Consumer Protection laws, of which I know very well.

      So yes I am the expert here, as clearly you have no idea what you are talking about!

      There is NO law that states any medium MUST say they are for entertainment only.
      The ONLY reason to state that is if you are a fraud, and you do not want to be sued for making illegal claims.

      Any real medium can say they are real. Funny how none do!

      Nice try but you just got "owned" by the master!
      Why dont you try again?

      You do realise I am the person who got the law changed and the old Fraudulent Mediums Act of 1951 removed and made it so that mediums had to answer to the Consumer Proection act right?

      I believe the word for your ignorance is "Whoops"

      Delete
    2. They say "for entertainment purposes" so they can hopefully avoid being prosecuted under the Fraud Act 2006 or the Consumer Rights Act 2015. When they say their act is for "entertainment only" what they are confessing to is they have no psychic ability whatsoever and are merely performing entertainers. There is no law on the statute books that obliges people who claim to have psychic ability to proclaim that their performance is for "entertainment purposes". In fact, that would probably do nothing to protect them from being sued in a civil case. After all, the people who pay to see these psychics are expecting something supernatural to occur. They do not pay to simply be entertained; they can get entertainment on the TV free of charge.

      Delete
    3. All correct comments, the amount of times i have heard psychics claim that they are forced to use the Entertainment Only disclaimer. I always point out that nothing is forcing them to do so, and that any real psychic could claim to be real and have nothing to worry about.

      Delete
  3. I so do hope I get approval to post. But bla bla bla I already know what the answer will be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well you arent psychic as I am happy to publish your incorrect statements

      Delete
  4. And I can't remember ever saying I was psychic!

    And what I actually did say is true, in England.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No what you say is provably wrong!
      I know the law better than you, since I helped change it!

      You made a fool out of yourself, you thought you could catch me out, you fell on your face.

      And all because some medium probably told you all that, and like a fool you believed them.
      Trust me, no one knows the law better than me!

      Now run along, you are boring me.

      Delete
  5. I also love how you seem to have the same disclaimer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes i do, its called Satire!
      See the title "IF I WAS A LYING PSYCHIC:" Right above the disclaimer!

      I actually take responsibility for everything I say, and better still i can back it all up!

      Delete
  6. Psychics and Mediums are real.

    They do exist.

    However, no genuine psychic or medium will charge money or appear on a TV show or take any monetary gain whatsoever.

    They can't. Charging for that kind of thing does not and cannot co-exist.

    If anyone asks you to pay for a reading, then they are a fraud or delusional. And that is said without any exceptions.

    Firstly, you do not talk with dead. Why would you want to?
    It is a terrible and unpleasant business and almost all of the time, they cant see or hear you anyway. To linger means they are stuck in their own manifestation which doesn't include you.

    On the very rare occasion where you see them and they see you. They have that wide eyed scary stare. That's because they are bricking it about seeing you.

    Other times it is not even a ghost or spirit. Sometimes it is just a slip in time for a second or two.

    When someone dies and they actually 'go on'. They really dont have much interest in coming back for a visit. Some do, but only once or twice. They really dont give a brown about coming back. Just the same as you dont really want to go across there. And those that do are mentally ill.

    Then there are those people who genuinely work in a kind of spiritual environment. But it is more of a mindset, rather than conversing. And when any kind of contact happens, it is vague and completely irrelevant to anyone other than yourself.
    Then you have to find out what it means and learn something.

    Eventually when it gets to any level which is similar to the same kind of 'gifts' tv psychics have or charging mediums claim to be able to do. You would not be able to charge. You wouldn't want to charge. You wouldn't want to share it and you would be encouraged not to.

    So, if you are watching it on telly or going to pay someone for a reading or even going to an evening of clairvoyance, it is most definitely and without exception, a fraud.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You say "Psychics and Mediums are real. They do exist."

      Where is the evidence? Who are you to make such a statement in the first place?
      You say so much as if from a position of knowledge and authority, yet you offer no proof.
      It is just fanciful story telling.

      Delete
    2. I made the statement in support of your site.

      Like most people here, I watched the Most Haunted Live, mainly because I find Paul o Grady funny. But I was kind of shocked at how awful it was. It was basically mocking everybody and treating everyone like an idiot. So I wanted to see if anyone else was as shocked as I was, which brought me to your blog.

      I thought perhaps I was offering some kind of support to your venture. I am against all psychics and mediums that charge and appear on television. And of course those that write books and release ridiculous oracle cards etc etc.

      I have no position of authority and I offer no proof.

      I just want people to wake up and stop giving their money away to people who simply could not be genuine. There are no exceptions.

      Anyway, If what I wrote before has upset you. Or if you expected more from it other than what was already there, I am sorry. It was not a challenge. It was not intended to make any difference to what you are already doing.
      And I think on hindsight, that I did say too much.

      I Wont bother you again, and I wish you all the best of luck and success.

      Delete
    3. How does saying mediums are real support my site?

      You say "I have no position of authority and I offer no proof. "

      Yet you speak as if what you are saying is a proven fact.
      EVERYTHING You said is provably wrong and incorrect.

      You haven't upset me, you have annoyed me that you come on here, talk a load of nonsense, offer no proof, and expect me to just let it lie.

      You told LIES. But you try to wrap the lies up in some truthful statements to try and give it credibility, when clearly there is none whatsoever.

      And you are welcome to bother me as much as you like, especially as you started the conversation by making outlandish claims.

      Why dont you back up what you say? Or admit you are a liar. It can be only one of the other

      Delete
  7. You know...I thought your site would be a good thing....but your a humongous ass! All you do is belittle the people who try and comment and support you. So I'm not supporting you. I hope you do find a real medium one day so they can spit in your face, because that's what you deserve. There's nothing wrong with exposing frauds but all you do "sir" is act like an elephants rear end. (You know because all that comes out of your mouth is shit) So from me and I'm sure most of the people reading the way you've talked to the other people to comment on here I say "screw you, go throw yourself off a cliff"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not need nor covert your support.
      The fact you are here and reading my posts means I am succeeding at what I set out to do.

      Delete
    2. Most people were probably jumped to this page via a link from a google search. I read one of the articles on this site and felt it was very well written. Then, I saw the scrutiny you place upon your viewers. I understand being a skeptic but to throw out anything anyone says that doesn't completely parallel your mindset is ignorant. Especially when some were written in a very friendly peaceful manner. How one handles themselves contributes to their overall credibility. How your rebuttals are written and handled discredits anything you have on this site. You may think that people reading your posts means that you are succeeding in what you sent out to do when in actuality people may want to align with the viewpoint opposite of yours simply because of how you have treated them. You can say only an idiot would believe this or that when it is possible to disprove scientific laws. People believe what they believe based on a combination of the experiences they have had, their culture, their environment, upbringing, intelligence, etc. Whatever it may be it is not your place, or anyone's to deem a belief as idiotic. Really, most things are probable. There was a time when people could not imagine the possibility of a computer, let alone touch screen - or the ability to fly in he air in a craft. People would laugh and say that such devices would only be explainable by some sort of magick. Now it is completely normal. Some cultures and beliefs revolve heavily around astrology - Hindu being one. Who are you to claim an entire culture to be idiotic? It's actually a scientific viewpoint to think that time is not linear and the we could experience multiple universes or points in time while remaining where we are.

      Delete
    3. I call something idiotic when it has now evidence at all, has been completely debunked, is based on flawed thinking and so on.

      You mention Astrology, EVERYONE who believes in astrology is a fool, BECAUSE it is nonsense and has been proven to be.

      And even if Astrology could be real, the way the stars move and have moved since the inception of astrology makes it all useless anyway.

      So the fact it has been 100% debunked, every aspect of it from top to bottom, to still believe in it is to be foolish. Sorry but that is the truth, just because a lot of people believe in something does not make it any more real.

      For example the moon illusion (Google it).
      I could line up 1 million people, shoulder to shoulder, and tell them to look at the moon while it is low on the horizon, and pretty much everyone would say the moon is larger than normal, now obviously it is not, but you have 1 million people all claiming the exact same thing, and every single one of them is wrong, can be proven wrong, the effect can be explained by science. Now after explaining why this illusion happens, and educating people, if they still believe the moon to actually be bigger, then yes they are a fool.

      I have no respect for beliefs which are based on ignorance, whether that be a belief in a God who raped a 12 year old girl to give birth to himself, who would later become a zombie (Christianity) or whether you believe that humans have magic powers to bend metal with their minds, or people can talk to the dead.

      You mention the time when people could not imagine a computer, you know what changed? SCIENCE! TECHNOLOGY!!!

      Science evolves, even the very thing you are using to have a go at me is because of SCIENCE, not religion, not belief but science.

      So please understand when I call someone an idiot, this is not just some blind opinion from a keyboard warrior, it is something that is based in fact.

      If you believe in fairies in your garden, you are an idiot, if you believe in magical men who live in the sky who have no problem drowning newborn disabled babies (The great flood), then you are an idiot, if you believe that Uri Geller bends spoons with his mind you are an idiot, as clearly he is doing it the hard way!

      Delete
  8. Jon Donnis.. sadly it's your big ego that is getting in the way of anything really constructive. Didn't need a psychic to tell me that either, you have.
    Something you haven't done, is to actually 'prove the Scientific Researchers who actually have accomplished numerous studies and tests, along with numerous peer reviewed research papers on the subject of Pyschic phenomena and ESP and it's existence.

    Till then chap.... your wasting your time here.

    I do agree that there are fraudulent spinners about and Psychic wannabe's, BUT on the flip side there are also genuine cases. Till you know the subject matter in it's entirety and true form, you have no knowledge, or awareness how to test it, let alone question it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Damn your grammar is so poor it is hard to understand what you abusive post is actually saying.

      So instead lets look at some provable scientific and historical facts.

      100% of psychics/mediums fail 100% of the time in credible scientific tests when the chance to cheat is removed.
      No exceptions.

      Also you do realise that scientists on their own are the worst people to test psychics, its like getting a car mechanic to judge the work of a plumber.

      I clearly have way more knowledge, awareness, and experience in this field than you, by the obvious and simple mistakes you make.

      Name one psychic who has passed a single CREDIBLE test that has then been successfully peer reviewed and replicated by CREDIBLE RESPECTED scientists under the watchful gaze and instruction of professional respected magicians, The very people who know how to fool better than anyone else.

      Look up the Project Alpha Hoax. EDUCATE yourself!

      And until you are educated, I would advise against speaking to someone like me, who will always make you look a fool, using science, historical facts, and a knowledge you could never dream to match.

      Now go play with your crystals and candles, and leave the serious debate to the adults with an IQ over 70

      Delete
  9. I'd love to know if Tony Ortzen, Maurice Barbanell, Brother John and the rest really believed all the total nonsense they printed, year after year, in Psychic News. They must have been laughing all the way to the bank.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You'd be surprised how gullible a lot of people involved in spiritualism but who are not mediums really are.

      A lot of times they are the true believers and are victims just like the people that the mediums rip off

      Delete
  10. check out heather tarot on facebook. i know for a fact this person is a fraud.is a person who run away from severe debts. and based in grangemouth scotland

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course she is a fraud!! She is doing tarot! only an idiot would think that is real anyway

      Delete
    2. I'm confused. If as you state "all psychics are frauds" then why do you need this list?

      Delete
    3. Well you got me there, ok I guess it is just a list of recent psychics I have exposed as frauds, there are many many more on the forum

      Delete